Can GLM-5.3 disable reasoning?
No. GLM-5.3 always enables reasoning. The official native reasoning_effort supports low, high, and max, with max as the default; these levels and the default are not equivalent to the request settings in the platform interface. When using /v1/chat/completions, it is recommended to explicitly choose reasoning_effort: low or high, rather than directly submitting the native max or copying the thinking field. When migrating older applications, remove configurations that disable reasoning; to reduce reasoning intensity, start with low.
What are the main differences from GLM-5.2?
Both use the same base model. GLM-5.3 enhances complex code, long-horizon tasks, and safety analysis through post-training. When choosing, compare patch correctness, test pass rates, and rework counts using real projects; do not treat benchmark improvements as direct gains for every project.
Can I give it an entire code repository?
The native 1M tokens context is suitable for organizing larger code materials, but not every repository can fit in full. It is recommended to first include the directory structure, key modules, and relevant tests, retain file paths and version information, then add dependencies as needed for analysis; set the output budget according to the deliverable.
How do I call glm-5.3 using the standard API?
Submit model=glm-5.3 and messages to /v1/chat/completions. Read regular results from choices[].message.content; use stream to obtain incremental results for streaming calls. Use this platform's API Key, and configure the full base URL according to the SDK you use.
Can it automatically modify files and run tests?
The model can plan changes, generate code, and propose function calls, but execution requires available tools and permissions. When integrating it yourself, execute tool requests and return the results, then let the model determine the next step; without real test results, generated test descriptions cannot be considered verified as passing.