GPT-6 Luna is a multimodal reasoning model in the OpenAI GPT-6 series that emphasizes efficiency and cost of use, suitable for breaking everyday business workflows into tasks with clear boundaries and repeatable acceptance criteria. It continues the generation's improvements in factuality, programming, and collaborative communication, and can be used for text classification, information extraction, screenshot analysis, and targeted code assistance; compared with Sol and Astra, it is better suited as a regular choice for high-frequency tasks.
Point the Base URL to api.acedata.cloud, configure your platform API key and the model ID below, and use your compatible SDK or client.
api.acedata.cloudgpt-6-lunaimport os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
api_key=os.environ["ACEDATACLOUD_API_KEY"],
base_url="https://api.acedata.cloud/v1",
)
response = client.responses.create(
model="gpt-6-luna",
input="Hello!",
)
print(response.output_text)Choose an available protocol for this model. OpenAI SDK uses a Base URL ending in /v1; Anthropic SDK uses the root URL. See each guide for protocol-specific parameters, tools and response formats.
Clarify capacity, input and output, and invocation methods before selecting a model.
GPT-6 Luna's multimodal reasoning positioning and API operations are described separately; formats, tools, and output budgets are configured according to the selected endpoint.
Learn what gpt-6-luna can bring to your work.
Luna is well suited to work with focused goals and fixed delivery formats, such as labeling intent for tickets, extracting order fields from emails, and generating short summaries according to rules. Providing label definitions, missing-value rules, and examples together makes validation easier than simply asking to “analyze content,” and also makes it suitable for handling independent subtasks in larger workflows.
Compared with GPT-5.6 Luna, improvements in the same generation include factuality and collaborative communication. It is better suited to organizing provided materials into clear conclusions, evidence, and items requiring confirmation, reducing irrelevant terminology and lengthy explanations. For questions requiring judgment rather than mechanical extraction, task evaluation can be combined with reasoning controls instead of making every response pursue maximum elaboration.
The model has vision and reasoning capabilities, enabling it to organize responses around screenshots, charts, and written descriptions, as well as participate in code explanation, error analysis, and localized modifications. Official software engineering evaluations show that it can handle more complex programming tasks; in actual use, relevant code, error information, and acceptance criteria should still be provided to keep the scope of changes controllable.
Start with specific tasks to identify where the model can be effective.
Input the ticket text, business label descriptions, and target fields, and have Luna return the category, order number, issue summary, and missing information. Separate the reasoning basis from the field results to facilitate manual spot checks; when machine-readable output is needed, JSON output can be configured, and the application can validate required fields, enum values, and formats before proceeding to subsequent business workflows.
Submit product screenshots or chart links together with specific questions, such as comparing interface states, summarizing trends in a chart, or describing visible information on an error page. Deliverables can include an observation checklist, a summary of differences, and recommendations for further investigation. Tasks should focus on visible content in the image and avoid asking the model to guess obscured text or background information that was not provided.
Provide function code, exception logs, and expected behavior, and have Luna explain possible causes, propose small-scope changes, and generate test-case drafts. For repeated code explanations or localized checks, a standardized prompt template can be used. The final deliverable should include the rationale for changes and validation steps; test execution and merge decisions should still be completed by the development environment and team.
Choose based on task complexity, input materials, and expected results.
For clearly bounded classification, extraction, summarization, and localized code tasks, Luna can be the preferred choice; when tasks involve cross-module changes, long-process planning, or complex tool collaboration, consider GPT-6 Sol. If the project prioritizes the highest quality and deeper judgment rather than efficiency trade-offs, GPT-6 Astra is the more demanding choice in the same generation. Tasks should be assigned based on actual acceptance results, rather than treating models in the same series as fully equivalent.
GPT-6 Luna continues Luna's efficiency-focused positioning and improves factuality, programming, and collaboration performance. When migrating, it is recommended to replay existing tickets, extraction samples, and code tasks, comparing field accuracy, omissions, and rework. GPT-6.1 Sol is another model, not Luna's new name; do not replace all tasks simply because of a version update. Choose based on business difficulty and delivery quality.
Based on the characteristics of gpt-6-luna, first validate a small task whose results can be checked.
You can ask directly: Process tickets according to these classification rules, and output the category, urgency, source evidence, and a one-sentence summary. When information is insufficient, return pending review; do not fabricate user background.
Use real tickets and edge-case samples; separately check classification accuracy, missing values, and whether the results are easy for programs to read.
Use the full model ID gpt-6-luna, first confirm the public request format and available parameters on the API page, then connect the application. Retain result parsing, exception handling, and relevant evidence, and evaluate with the same set of real samples whether it is suitable for continued use.
Before formal use, understand the output quality and scope of capabilities.
Answers to common questions about using gpt-6-luna.
Use gpt-6-luna. It corresponds to GPT-6 Luna and is not an alias for GPT-6 Sol or GPT-6.1 Sol. When choosing Chat Completions, submit model and messages; when choosing Responses, submit model and input, and read the answer according to their respective response structures.
Luna can be used for image-and-text understanding, such as analyzing screenshots, describing visible content, or answering questions using charts. Chat Completions can place text and image_url in the same message. Visual understanding and image generation are different tasks; when you need to generate or edit images, choose a dedicated image model.
First specify field names, data types, allowed values, and how missing information should be handled, then choose JSON output settings. For classification or extraction tasks, keep the structure simple. Even if returned content can be parsed, continue checking field completeness and business constraints; correct formatting does not mean factual correctness.
For extraction tasks with straightforward rules and sufficient information, clear instructions are the priority; when facing multi-condition judgments, conflicting information, or code localization, compare results with different reasoning efforts. Chat Completions uses reasoning_effort, while Responses uses the reasoning object; use the quality and usage of real samples to determine the configuration.
When using Chat Completions, put relevant history into messages; when using Responses, organize input and related conversation content according to the documentation. Provide the latest materials, revised objectives, and key constraints in each turn; for longer tasks, retain interim summaries and a final version that can be checked independently.
Choose a development approach or application suited to this model and follow its setup guide.
↗OpenAI Chat Completions API
SDK installation, authentication and examples↗OpenAI Responses API
SDK installation, authentication and examples
↗Using Ace Data Cloud with Cherry Studio
Chat client setup · Base URL, API key and model
↗Using Ace Data Cloud with ChatBox
Chat client setup · Base URL, API key and modelInput
$0.02per 1M tokens
Official $0.10
Output
$0.1per 1M tokens
Official $0.50
You pay$13,584for 142,800 credits · $0.0951 / credits46% OFF
You're billed in credits. Pick a top-up tier to see its per-credit rate — the larger the top-up, the cheaper each credit.
This is only a basic call example. See the full docs for more parameters and advanced usage.
View Docs